Jump to content


Advertisement




Photo
- - - - -

coming soon


  • Please log in to reply
37 replies to this topic

#31 hawkwood

hawkwood

    Advanced Member

  • Art Guru
  • 510 posts

Posted 12 April 2005 - 10:58 PM

give me odds? :) good night all I have to get my daughter up for school in 7 hours so I'm going to bed :shades:

Advertisement




#32 Alex

Alex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 688 posts

Posted 12 April 2005 - 11:01 PM

Nitie nite sleep tight. Blah blah Blah.X
We don't stop playing because we get old, we get old because we stop playing.
My Webpage

#33 Deco

Deco

    ARTTRADE.NET

  • Admin
  • 2,257 posts

Posted 13 April 2005 - 08:14 AM

Im probably just being paranoid today :)  but it will show up all those little errors in the detail (mostly the smaller feathers) and things like the fact that the set of five small feathers at the top are too bright and throw the composition out. the one roughed up looking feather just to the right of the big feathers is compleatly laking in detail. Only the 'beak' and the wing shaped fire have reflected light assossiated with them all of the feathers dont. there is a group of three feathers on the left which were the first ones I did while I was still a little unsure about how I was going to paint them and they look crap. I could go on?

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Don't know why you think the painting must be more detailed and closer
to the image that you use? I like it as it looks :D - like fire from
feathers and colours are amazing! :shades:
MyPaintings.Info - My web site
Fashionchat.info - Fashion Blog

#34 hawkwood

hawkwood

    Advanced Member

  • Art Guru
  • 510 posts

Posted 13 April 2005 - 10:05 PM

thank you Deco that means alot and was what I was aiming for. :rolleyes: none of the painting is drawn from anything it is all imaginary, I just thought that one feather looks out of place as it is laking the same level of detail as the rest.

a slightly better photo of the painting will be posted tonight as soon as I have resized it. but it has been a git to photograph even remotley correctly :whistling2:

#35 hawkwood

hawkwood

    Advanced Member

  • Art Guru
  • 510 posts

Posted 13 April 2005 - 10:17 PM

better photo, but I'm still not happy with the photo it is still blurry. this painting must have decided to be camera shy :rolleyes: I will keep trying intermitently and will edit in a good photo if I ever get one.

Attached File  Pheonix2.jpg   63.66KB   51 downloads

Edit..........
I forgot to give size :whistling2:
205mm x 253mm

Edited by hawkwood, 14 April 2005 - 08:37 AM.


#36 Alex

Alex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 688 posts

Posted 14 April 2005 - 03:11 PM

The clearer the shot, the better it looks, I thinks some one owes me some CHOCOLATE< Yipeeeeeeeeeee :whistling2:
We don't stop playing because we get old, we get old because we stop playing.
My Webpage

#37 hawkwood

hawkwood

    Advanced Member

  • Art Guru
  • 510 posts

Posted 14 April 2005 - 11:14 PM

whats your favourite? :)

#38 Alex

Alex

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • 688 posts

Posted 15 April 2005 - 03:18 PM

I would settle for some Dairy milk ......just plain old eat it at once stuff. Tee Hee
We don't stop playing because we get old, we get old because we stop playing.
My Webpage




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Advertisement